Are MotoGP Stewards guilty of inconsistent decision-making?
That’s how I feel about the FIM Stewards - this season, last sꦦeason.
At 𝓀Assen, for exampl🌳e. Brad Binder was on the green, by the [smallest amount]. He went back to fourth place.
At the British MotoGP which was won by Aleix Espargaro, we saw 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Francesco Bagnaia on the green as he came out of Stowe.
Everyone could see he was on the green. 🔴He didn’t lose any positions. Why? Because the sensors didn’t go off♒.
But when you see it from multiple angles - the helicopter, the TV🐽 angle which we see - you can see tha♋t he’s on the green.
Be🌱cause the sensors didn’t go off it means he doesn’t get punished. But that’s not the point. You’re re🉐lying on technology to tell you when someone goes on the green.
The 𓄧Stewards look back at vid🎀eo evidence and didn’t see anything wrong.
It’s just crazy. Bagnaia was on the green just as much, ꧙if not more, than Binder was.ꩲ It’s not fair.
It’s nothing to do with Bagnaia. If this was Enea Bastianini or Maverick Vinales, the video would be th🐬e same.
It’s the inconsistent decision-making which is just n𝓡ot right🐎.
We’re in the territory where the FIM St🍌ewards are becoming like FIA Stewards in F1.
Terrible inconsistency. That’s the problem I ha🍸ve. Inconsistent decision-making.
Someone get༺s a penalty, then someone gets a penalty way worse for doing s🌞omething that’s not as bad…
What’s the solution? Thaꦰt the sensors didn’t go off surelyꦡ points at the technology that they’re using not being 100% accurate.
They could replicate that by saying ‘Bagnaia was on the green, Binder was 0.4s b🎀ehind’. Surely that means he has to drop a place.
168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Brad Binder couldn’t overtake Bagnaia? Not the point. Remember back to the Austrian MotoGP in 2021, which Binder won, he went on the green at the last corner and got a three-second penalty. It didn’t matter because he𒐪 won🤡 by [more].
He got a penalty eveܫn though it didn’t affect anyone behind him.
When are we going to get fairer decision-making?
