Are MotoGP Stewards guilty of inconsistent decision-making?
That’s how I feel about the FIM Stewards -☂ this s🙈eason, last season.
At Assen, for example. Brad Binder was on the green, by the [smallest amount]. He went back to 🤡fourth place.
At the British MotoGP which was won by Aleix Espargaro, we saw 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Francesco Bagnaia on the green as he came out of Stowe.
Everyone could see he was on the green. He didn’t lose any positions. Why? B💦ecause the sensors didn’t go off.
But when you 𒈔see i🐼t from multiple angles - the helicopter, the TV angle which we see - you can see that he’s on the green.
Because the sensors didn’t go off it means he doesn’t get punished. But that’s not the point.💧 You’re relying on technology to tell you when someone g🎃oes on the green.
The Stewards look back ꦇat video evidence and didn’t see anything wrong.
It’🦂s just cra🎃zy. Bagnaia was on the green just as much, if not more, than Binder was. It’s not fair.
It’🐷s nothing to do with Bagnaia. If this was Enea Bastianini or Maverick Vinales, the video would be the same.
It’s🌞 the inconsistent ♔decision-making which is just not right.
We’re in the territor💯y where the FIM Stewards are becoming ▨like FIA Stewards in F1.
Terrible inconsistency. That’s the problem I have. I๊nconsistent decision-making.
Someꦆone gets a penalty, then someone🐬 gets a penalty way worse for doing something that’s not as bad…
What’s the solution? That the sensor🎶s didn’𝓰t go off surely points at the technology that they’re using not being 100% accurate.
They could replicate that by saying ‘Bagnaia was on the green, Binder was 0.4s෴ behind’. Surely that means he has to drop a place.
168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Brad Binder couldn’t over🏅take Bagnaia? Not the point. Remember back to the Austrian MꦫotoGP in 2021, which Binder won, he went on the green at the last corner and got a three-second penalty. It didn’t matter because he won by [more].
He got a penaꦍlty even though it didn’t affect anyone behin😼d him.
When are we going to get fairer decision-making?
