Sky Sports F1 pundit Karun Chandhok doesn’t think 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Fernando Alonso’s tactics at the Australian Gra꧂nd Prix will stop other teams from signing him for 💃2025.

Alonso was hit with a 20-second time penalty after the 🌳race by the stewards for "an unusual manoeuvre".

The incident occurred when Alonso was at Turn 6, he lifted off significantly, which impacted 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:George Russell’s approach to the corner.

Russell💝 was distracted and impacted by the dirty air created from Alonso’s Aston Martin, resulting in the Mercedes driver crashing out.

While Russell didn’t have contact wi🐓th Alonso or even take evasive action, the stewards described it as “potentially dangerous”.

As a result, he was hit with a drive-through penalty - which was convert🌱ed to 2꧙0 seconds - dropping from sixth to eighth.

Alonso has protested his innocence sinc𒐪e, while Aston Martin boss Mike Krack put out a passiona𒊎te statement in his defence.

Writing for Sky’s F1 website, Chandhok dismissed suggestions that Alonso’s antics in Au🧸stralia 🌳could impact his chances of other teams signing him.

"No, I don't think so. Fernando is a ruthless, brilli🌸ant and smart competitor,” Chandhok wrote.

"Alonso is a tough competitor who has a sort of win-at-all-costs approach. And I guess any team who signs him up is signing him up for that. So I don't think it has any impact on the ꦏfuture.

"I think whatever happens the ▨future, will be a decision independent of this incident in Melbourne. I don't think a single incident ꦗlike this will make a team sign or not sign a driver."

There was much debate over whether Alonso deserved a penalty in the൲ first place given there was no contact with Russell and similar tactics have been deployed by other drivers in the past.

Chandhok felt the unpredictable nature of Alonso’s actions was the re𝓰ason why Alonso was penaliꦆsed.

"There's a way to drive tac꧟tically, and there's a way that goes slightly beyond what is being jud꧟ged as fair, and in this instance, it feels like that was the case,” he added.

"If I look at Alonso's example of Imola 2005 that he cited, that was brilliant tactical driving by him, positioning the car in the right p🍸lace at the right time, slowing the corner entry to get a better exit. But it was done in a predictable manner, and I think that is the keyword here, predictable.

"A lot of people have referenced Kevin Magnussen's driving in Jeddah, questioning how it was okay for him to intentionally slow down the field there, but Alonso got done for the move in Melbourne. There was a predictability in what Magnussen was doing. He was driving in a tactical way, slowing down mid-corner in long radius corners where there was only o🥃ne line, so nobody had the opportunity to overtake him. But it was done in a way that the cars behind knew what he was doing.

"In Fernando's case, looking at some of the GPS data as well, what's quite clear is, in contrast to his own driving in the previous few laps, he seemed to back off and brake significantly e🉐arlier on t🐭his lap and then accelerated and braked again. And that's where the unpredictability came in for George.

"I think any driver on the planet w🍎ould have obviously tried to brake early to get a good exit, I think where this perhaps crossed the line is it was so much earlier, so much so that heꦚ in fact had to speed up again."