Expert judgement backs stewards and deals a blow to Lando Norris
Anthony Davidson masterclass anaജlyses key incident ꦇat F1 United States GP

The “consistent” stewards delivered the right decision to penalise 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Lando Norris at the F1 United S🍨tates Grand Prix, an🍌 expert analysis has found.
Norris dropped from third to fourth in Texas due to a five-second time penalty for overtaking 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Max Verstappen off-track at Turn 12 with four laps remaining.
McLaren vented their annoyance at the stewards’ call but a thorough analysis has gone a🌞gainst Norris.
Sky Sports’ Anthony Davidson rewatched the slo-mo highlights and explained why the stewards weไre correct.
Davidson first analysed a previous Nor𝕴ris v Verstappen battle, saying: “We have been seeing this happen all weekend, particularly at Turn 12.
“On Lap 51, one of Norris’ earlier attempts on Verstappen. Verstappen covers♋ the inside - that’s what you hope to do to the attacking car, put them off the racin💛g line.
“Nothing he can really do. There is no significant part of his car alongside. The only thing he can do is switch the line and appear on the outside, or try to attack the inside of Turn 13. But Max had that cov🍌ered.
“He slips up aroundꦜ Turn 13 and runs wide. It gives Lando the opportunity to have a clear track in fr﷽ont of him.
“He almost has too good of a run, in many ways. Now he’s forced to go around the outside around Turn 14 into 15. It’s not really ideal. If you’re a little further behind the car in front, you can pop on 💛the inside of 15, and the element of surprise is there.
“Max was driving brilliantly defensively. Ho𝓰w ﷽to defend properly? It was such a good example, and went on for many laps.”
'Stewards have been consistent'
Then Davidson judged the con𒈔troversial incident: “On Lap 52, Max made an early move. Much earlier than the previous lap.
“Lando thinks about going to the inside but then swaps back. Now he’s again committed to the outside. But, this time, it’s𝕴 differe♓nt to the previous move because he’s ahead at this stage.
“Now we’re in a position where [Norris] wants ♏to stay close to the racing line. Th🤡e reason he can’t go to the racing line is because Max is lurking on the inside, and he knows it.
“Now the tricky situation ❀- deemed to be ♌pushed off the track or not?
“What you’re looking💞 for is: is the overtaker the aggressor? Are you in front of the car that you’re racing against?
“[Max was] before th▨e corner had properly started. The ru𝓰le says you need a significant part of your car ahead of the car that you’re fighting when you’re the overtaker, especially when you’re at the apex. It’s clear to see that [Norris] is not.
“When he turns into the apex, he is. But at th♈e key point of the corner, he’s not.
“So the car in the defensive position is ahead,ꦯ and can dictate where you pꩵut the car.
“It’s quite cheeky to try to drive around somebody, expecting them to give you time on the outside. It can happen but it’s no🧜t going to happen with Verstappen. Norris knows that.
“Pushed off the track? You could argue that you wer൩e. But you weren’t𓄧 ahead.”
Both Norris and Ve🃏rstappen were taken off track during their th💃rilling battle for the final podium spot.
Davidson saidꦏ: “Verstappen would get a warning for going off the track. We saw drivers pick up warnings throughout the race. H❀e’d get a warning for leaving the track and gaining the advantage.
“Lando, meanwhile, is overtaking a car off the track. You see the difference? That’s what I feel the stewards saw. They have♎ been consistent this weekend.”
Davidsoꦦn finally pleaded with the Circuit of the Americas to adjust Turn 12 to prevent future incidents.
He said: “My final gripe:ꦛ they shouldn’t be [off track] at all. Please, Austin circuit, make changes! Put gravel there! Then it’s not a talking point!”

James was a sports journalist 🍬at Sky Sports for a decade covering everything from American sports, to football, to F1.