Why the drivers are adamant F1 still needs DRS after Saudi Arabian GP

Reigning Formula 1 champion Max Verstappen believes the sport still needs the drag reduction system as he wouldn’t have been able to overtake Charles Leclerc for the lead of the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix without it.
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 leads Charles Leclerc (MON) Ferrari F1-75.
Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 leads Charles Leclerc (MON) Ferrari F1-75.

F1 once again enjoyed a titanic scrap for the race victory in Jeddah🗹 as Verstappen and Leclerc duelled it out.

Verstappen moved to within DRS range of Leclerc on Lap 42 before overt🌄aking the Ferrari driv❀er into Turn 1 on Lap 47.

Up unt𝄹il that point, both driversꦐ repeatedly backed off on the approach to the DRS detection zone at Turn 27 to ensure they had the overtaking tool available to complete the manoeuvre into the first corner.

Due to how easy it is to follow other cars as a result of the new generation of cars, many in the F1 paddock have questioned whether there is still a need for DR൲S.

Speaking after the race in Jeddah, Verstappen admitted that he would have finished second without ♏it.

“Well, if I didn't have DRS today I would have never passed,” he said. “I think we are still too sensitive for♛ th💜at.

“And of course, some tracks are easier to pass than others꧃. But for me at the moment, if DRS wouldn't be there, I would have been second today.”

Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Ferrari F1-75.
Carlos Sainz Jr (ESP) Ferrari F1-75.

Carlos Sainz also agreed with Verstappen but said F1 needs to consider the length of its act♕ivation zones given how powerful it is and it does not result in side-by-side battling at the braking zone.

“I think without DRS, passing would be reduced significantly,” Sainz explained. “So I think we are still better off with DRS. Wha🐲t we might need to consider maybe is the speed delta that there is with the DRS might be a bit too much, which gives the car behind maybe too much of a speed delta [so] that 🍌sometimes the overtake is done before the braking.

“And you’d much rather have the two cars battling under braking rather than passing like in the highway. Now, that is sometimes what can ꦚhappen. So maybe we need to have a look at this but we definitely need DRS nowadays.”

A game of ‘cat and mouse’

With the DRS zone positi♔oned on the approach to the final corn🗹er, positioning was key as Leclerc attempted to keep Verstappen behind.

“I basica🃏lly knew that if I was leaving Max with a DRS be𒁏hind for the main straight, I will be overtaken very easily,” Leclerc said. “So I just wanted that DRS.

“On the first lap I braked very early and I got the DRS anꦜd manage to overtake back on the run to turn one. And then the second one, obviously Max knew that I was going to do that, so we both braked quite early, but I still managed to stay in front at the end. The third time, it didn’t work out for me.”

Charles Leclerc (MON) Ferrari F1-75 and Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 battle for the lead of the race.
Charles Leclerc (MON) Ferrari F1-75 and Max Verstappen (NLD) Red Bull Racing RB18 battle for…

Even though Verstappen took the win in Saudi Arabia, Red Bull team boss Christian Horner conceded that changes have t🐼o be made.

“The DRS is so powerful you could see there was a game of cat and mouse between the drivers, where th𓃲ey’d brake to a point that they accelerated ꦐto the corner,” Horner added.

“Maybe we should look at where that DRS detection zone is for future yea𒅌rs as you definitꦛely want to avoid being in that situation.”

Conversely, Mercedes boss Toto Wolff enjoyed Leclerc and Vers🍸tappen'sဣ tactics to get the DRS in Jeddah.

“I like it personally,” Wolff said. “I think the cars delivered on what F1 hoped for, great overtaking and DRS is powerful but it provides a great show now. I think that was ent🃏ertaining t🥂o watch.”

Read More