Carlos Sainz rages at “the most unfair penalty I’ve ever seen” for Fernando Alonso clash at F1 Australian GP

Carlos Sainz has branded the penalty that dropped him out of the points in the F1 Australian Grand Prix as “the most unfair I’ve seen in my life”. 
Sainz rages at “the most unfair penalty I’ve ever seen” for Alonso clash

The Ferrari driver was slapped with a five-second time penalty for pitching 168澳洲5最新开奖结果:Fernando Alonso’s Aston Martin into a spin at Turn 1 at the final standing restaᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤🧸⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚrt of Sunday’s chaotic race in Melbourne. 

Remote video URL

Sainz finished fourth on the road but due to the race ending under Safety Car conditions and the field being bunched up, the Spaniard was relegated down to 12th once his time penalty was applied at ༺the chequer൲ed flag. 

Sainz was left angered by the decision and only spoke briefly to the medi🥃a, citing he didౠ not want to receive another penalty for being late to the stewards’ office.  

“Right now I cann🌌ot talk I’m too angry, too disappointed,” Sainz said. “I just cannot say an♓ything.

“Iꦐ prefer to go to a stewards, get the penalty away because I don’t think I deserve it and is the most unfair penalty I’ve seꦇen in my life. 

“So I will go first to a stewards. I just need🧔 to come to the TV pen because if I don’t come, they put me another penalty.”&ꦆnbsp;

Sainz’s anguish was evident when he was informed of the penalty over team radio♊ during the wait for the race to be concluded. 

“No, it cannot be!” Sa💙inz pleaded. “Do I deserve to be out of the points? No, no! It’s unac🍌ceptable. Tell them that it is unacceptable. 

“They need to wait unꦇtil the race is finished and discuss with me. No💯, please, please, please, please wait and discuss with me! Clearly, the penalty is not deserved and it’s too severe.”

Alonso later admitted th𒀰at the penalty was probably “too harsh”.

Why was Sainz penalised? 

Sainz rages at “the most unfair penalty I’ve ever seen” for Alonso clash

The stewaꦰrds determine🥃d that Sainz was “wholly to blame” for the collision. 

“The Stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video, timing, telemetry, team radio and in-car video evidence and determined 💧that on the💖 first corner of the restart, a collision occurred between Car 55 and Car 14. We determined that Car 55 was wholly to blame for the collision.

“Car 14 ܫwas significantly ahead of Car 55 at the first corner and nevertheless Car 55 drove into Car 14, causing it to spin and leave the track. We accordingly imposed a 5-second penalty on Car 55.

“For avoidance of doubt, we took into account the fact that this collisio🔯n took place at the first lap of the restart, when, by convention, the Stewards would ty🎃pically take a more lenient view of incidents.

“However, in this particular case, notwithstanding the fact that it was the equivalent of a first lap incident, we considered that there was suffici✤ent gap for Car 55 to take steps to avoid the collision and failed to do so.”

Read More